case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-03-10 07:07 pm

[ SECRET POST #2624 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2624 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Outlander]


__________________________________________________



03.
[The Walking Dead]


__________________________________________________



04.
[How I Met Your Mother]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Twitch Plays Pokemon]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Batman, Kill La Kill, Borderlands]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Overlord]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Red Dwarf]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Paranatural]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Pitch Perfect]


__________________________________________________



11.
[Insidious: Chapter 2]


__________________________________________________
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 053 secrets from Secret Submission Post #375.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
lunabee34: (Default)

[personal profile] lunabee34 2014-03-11 02:58 am (UTC)(link)
I was gonna comment but now I don't need to.

:)

But I will still a little anyway even though you said this beautifully.

I think authorial intent and the author's history is certainly interesting when examining a text and certainly an appropriate approach to understanding/appreciating literature. As a teacher of writing, I can testify that often writers do not execute the ideas in their heads as successfully as they they believe they have. Writers also often create connections, associations, themes, etc. unconsciously in their works.

The author is important but if there's textual evidence, that trumps whatever the author says.