case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-03-10 07:07 pm

[ SECRET POST #2624 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2624 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Outlander]


__________________________________________________



03.
[The Walking Dead]


__________________________________________________



04.
[How I Met Your Mother]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Twitch Plays Pokemon]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Batman, Kill La Kill, Borderlands]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Overlord]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Red Dwarf]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Paranatural]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Pitch Perfect]


__________________________________________________



11.
[Insidious: Chapter 2]


__________________________________________________
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 053 secrets from Secret Submission Post #375.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2014-03-11 04:53 am (UTC)(link)
But we were talking about interpretations, not what counts as canon or not. A more apt example would be people who interpret Harry Potter as a queer narrative ("boy comes out of the closet") and insist that's as valid as it being a story about good vs. evil. Or, going on with the original example, a werewolf story doesn't become a story about racism just because someone interpreted it that way.

Death of the Author is used in analyzing the text, yes. But it's only one literary tool, no more or less valid. People taking into consideration JKR's words isn't a "problem", at least not on an analytic level. But on a fandom level... sorry, both sides have ground to stand on. You'll claim DotA all you want, because your interpretation is valid to you, while for others the author being alive is equally valid.