case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-03-10 07:07 pm

[ SECRET POST #2624 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2624 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Outlander]


__________________________________________________



03.
[The Walking Dead]


__________________________________________________



04.
[How I Met Your Mother]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Twitch Plays Pokemon]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Batman, Kill La Kill, Borderlands]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Overlord]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Red Dwarf]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Paranatural]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Pitch Perfect]


__________________________________________________



11.
[Insidious: Chapter 2]


__________________________________________________
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 053 secrets from Secret Submission Post #375.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

[personal profile] cbrachyrhynchos 2014-03-11 04:56 am (UTC)(link)
Well, apparently, the fact that Harry Potter succeeded in the mainstream means that we can't use it in a conversation about literary interpretation! :D :D

Well, if you're going to say that Rowling's comments in 2006 should completely dictate my interpretation of a text, pray tell, how do I get word of god from the Bronte sisters? Can you recommend a good medium or a seance?

What about the hundreds of mainstream authors who don't get every interview broadcast across the mass media? What about the authors who don't play the word of god game?

In other words, I think this poster is just a pretentious dick who really, really likes to be right.

Well, yes, I'm a pretentious dick. In this case, I'm also right in that I don't think that "OMG Dumbledore is totally gay" is why people read the books now, much less in 2046.

(Anonymous) 2014-03-11 12:52 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, yes, I'm a pretentious dick. In this case, I'm also right in that I don't think that "OMG Dumbledore is totally gay" is why people read the books now, much less in 2046.

No one has said that that's why they read the books. I certainly don't think that's the motivation for anyone reading them. It's something added on that some people might pay attention to, while others might not. Neither group is wrong.