Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-03-10 07:07 pm
[ SECRET POST #2624 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2624 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[Outlander]
__________________________________________________
03.

[The Walking Dead]
__________________________________________________
04.

[How I Met Your Mother]
__________________________________________________
05.

[Twitch Plays Pokemon]
__________________________________________________
06.

[Batman, Kill La Kill, Borderlands]
__________________________________________________
07.

[Overlord]
__________________________________________________
08.

[Red Dwarf]
__________________________________________________
09.

[Paranatural]
__________________________________________________
10.

[Pitch Perfect]
__________________________________________________
11.

[Insidious: Chapter 2]
__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 053 secrets from Secret Submission Post #375.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
Except, oh, I didn't write that. What I wrote was, "How much Beatles trivia and gossip about production and authorial intent gets packaged with their songs? None." So if you're going to write about things I specifically wrote to you, please try to actually read them.
And it is a discussion about literary analysis. Do you actually have anything to say about literary analysis? Do you actually have anything to say about how J.K. Rowling trivia changes the meaning of the Harry Potter novels? Or are you going to continue to argue the historical relevance of trivia instead?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-11 01:03 pm (UTC)(link)Note the word "discuss." When it came to the Beatles, you specifically said "packaged with the material," but with these items, you asked simply how often they are discussed. I don't think that anon's interpretation of that paragraph is therefore all that unreasonable.
no subject