[ SECRET POST #2629 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2629 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 071 secrets from Secret Submission Post #376.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 3 - too big ], [ 1 2 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Here's the problem. Don John is, yes, one of Shakespeare's worst villains, memorably described as "a bumbling second-rate Iago." I've seen many different actors take a whack at bringing him to life in an interesting way, and I've seen more fail than succeed. (I have a long and weird relationship with this specific play.)

However, Reeves didn't even try for interesting. He just went with a surface-level reading and failed to sell that. Bless him, he's a wonderful person, but he's just not much of an actor.

[(Anonymous)]

This. Not only does his performance not have depth, but he completely fails at being a surface-level villain-for-the-sake-of-villainy. I cringe every time I watch his performance.