[ SECRET POST #2630 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2630 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 060 secrets from Secret Submission Post #376.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: I probably shouldn't have read the thread before responding

[nyxelestia]

I guess this is one of those agree-to-disagree things. Outside of places that were already embroiled in a clusterfuck of other "etiquette issues", so to speak, I don't remember authors who preferred no concrit getting much flak, and it was usually shut down pretty quickly when it happened.

Besides which, authors who don't want feedback were usually in the minority, so in comparison to the near-dearth of interaction now, I honestly don't consider the 'payoff' worth it.

But then, I would take flames and sporking back tenfold if I meant I could get the fandom interaction back, so I know my opinion is not popular.