case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-03-17 06:43 pm

[ SECRET POST #2631 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2631 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 048 secrets from Secret Submission Post #376.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2014-03-18 02:56 am (UTC)(link)
Are you saying that indeed it was queer-baiting/they wanted to put in a lesbian relationship to that movie? You seem to be the only one agreeing with OP, can you explain what is the secret about? I saw Pocohontas a long time ago, but I sure don't remember any "no homo" parts of it.
otakugal15: (B/)

[personal profile] otakugal15 2014-03-18 06:46 pm (UTC)(link)
No.

Their insistence that it WAS queer baiting is me saying "Dude, that never would have happened because the 90s."

(Anonymous) 2014-03-19 01:24 am (UTC)(link)
Hmm, I thought queer baiting was part of homophobia? To tease fangirls and then say "haha no, that is not gay you stupid fans! They are so straight lol!" This term is very confusing for me... oh well, thanks for your help.