Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-03-20 06:51 pm
[ SECRET POST #2634 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2634 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[Lady Gaga]
__________________________________________________
03.

[free!, attack on titan]
__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

(Panic! at the Disco)
__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

[Anarky]
__________________________________________________
10.

(Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.)
__________________________________________________
11.

[Frozen]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 013 secrets from Secret Submission Post #376.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Okay here are some sources
(Anonymous) 2014-03-20 11:51 pm (UTC)(link)I don't give two craps about the ease of navigating a website. I care about whether or not that site is reputable. Daily Mail and NY Post are both disreputable, but the poster elevates NY Post over Daily Mail because NY Post has a better layout. There's something seriously wrong with that.
Re: Okay here are some sources
(Anonymous) 2014-03-20 11:58 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Okay here are some sources
(Anonymous) 2014-03-21 12:25 am (UTC)(link)But, when it comes to something like this, I would say that the quality and reliability of information matter. People will go to that link and, based on the information contained within, evaluate whether they should support this organization.
Re: Okay here are some sources
(Anonymous) 2014-03-21 09:51 am (UTC)(link)