case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-03-20 06:51 pm

[ SECRET POST #2634 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2634 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Lady Gaga]


__________________________________________________



03.
[free!, attack on titan]


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.
(Panic! at the Disco)


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.
[Anarky]


__________________________________________________



10.
(Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.)


__________________________________________________



11.
[Frozen]













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 013 secrets from Secret Submission Post #376.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Okay here are some sources

(Anonymous) 2014-03-20 11:51 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't know what you're trying to say.

I don't give two craps about the ease of navigating a website. I care about whether or not that site is reputable. Daily Mail and NY Post are both disreputable, but the poster elevates NY Post over Daily Mail because NY Post has a better layout. There's something seriously wrong with that.

Re: Okay here are some sources

(Anonymous) 2014-03-20 11:58 pm (UTC)(link)
DA. Uh, what? They just said that the layout was better; nothing on the quality or reliability of the information.

Re: Okay here are some sources

(Anonymous) 2014-03-21 12:25 am (UTC)(link)
That's true.

But, when it comes to something like this, I would say that the quality and reliability of information matter. People will go to that link and, based on the information contained within, evaluate whether they should support this organization.

Re: Okay here are some sources

(Anonymous) 2014-03-21 09:51 am (UTC)(link)
Your priorities are kind of wonky if you think this is a case of "seriously wrong"...