[ SECRET POST #2634 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2634 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Lady Gaga]


__________________________________________________



03.
[free!, attack on titan]


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.
(Panic! at the Disco)


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.
[Anarky]


__________________________________________________



10.
(Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.)


__________________________________________________



11.
[Frozen]













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 013 secrets from Secret Submission Post #376.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Okay here are some sources

[(Anonymous)]

Well, you're kind of right, in that I do have a pretty big problem with them. They are known to publish stories containing invented "facts." Why should I not have a problem with that? Why should I not speak out against that?

If you knew that someone was peddling misinformation, and you saw a bunch of people spreading said misinformation, would you keep your mouth shut?

Re: Okay here are some sources

[(Anonymous)]

DA

So instead of attacking the publications and pointing out (specific) instances where they're wrong and you have the accurate information right here, you're attacking people who dare to post the links. My, how noble of you.

Re: Okay here are some sources

[(Anonymous)]

Eh, you're right. Grant me that I'm just finding fast examples, here, but two examples for each:

http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2013/06/05/libel-lawsuit-filed-against-new-york-post-bombing-coverage/enRvNI9PSig0AHDxJHYqFJ/story.html
http://www.imediaethics.org/News/921/Ny_post_deletes_incorrect_liver_transplant_story_after_page_2_correction.php

http://mediamatters.org/research/2013/12/30/climate-change-misinformer-of-the-year-the-dail/197340
http://www.theguardian.com/media/greenslade/2011/dec/09/pcc-dailymail

Re: Okay here are some sources

[(Anonymous)]

Interesting how that was the thread stopper.

Re: Okay here are some sources

[(Anonymous)]

Interesting how it wasn't, actually. Timestamps are your friend.

Re: Okay here are some sources

[(Anonymous)]

Well, that depends. Are we counting the entire thread, or just this particular sub-thread?

Re: Okay here are some sources

[(Anonymous)]

Either way, it's been invalidated now. ;)

Re: Okay here are some sources

[(Anonymous)]

I don't know, the anon who asked for links hasn't said anything. So I'm not sure it's actually been invalidated.

Re: Okay here are some sources

[(Anonymous)]

Your need to have the last word is positively pathological. Get a grip.