[ SECRET POST #2634 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2634 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Lady Gaga]


__________________________________________________



03.
[free!, attack on titan]


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.
(Panic! at the Disco)


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.
[Anarky]


__________________________________________________



10.
(Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.)


__________________________________________________



11.
[Frozen]













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 013 secrets from Secret Submission Post #376.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Okay here are some sources

[(Anonymous)]

Shut. Up. You would have a fucking point if there was something wrong with the information. But there is nothing wrong with the information, and you are getting all worked up over nothing.

Re: Okay here are some sources

[(Anonymous)]

Is it okay to support a publication that routinely publishes bad information (and even outright lies) if it occasionally publishes something that's true?

Re: Okay here are some sources

[(Anonymous)]

Okay. So the information is correct and you are whining this much?

Re: Okay here are some sources

[(Anonymous)]

So your answer is "yes?"

Re: Okay here are some sources

[(Anonymous)]

I get where you're coming from. But, look: Fox News sometimes reports things that are correct. However, given that the network is geared toward advancing a specific agenda and more often than not presents information that isn't true, I'm not going to support them.

If a source proves itself to be disreputable, then I don't think it should be supported.

Re: Okay here are some sources

[(Anonymous)]

Even MSNBC occasionally gets things right.

Re: Okay here are some sources

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah, they do. But they're still not a network I would turn to or support.