[ SECRET POST #2634 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2634 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Lady Gaga]


__________________________________________________



03.
[free!, attack on titan]


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.
(Panic! at the Disco)


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.
[Anarky]


__________________________________________________



10.
(Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.)


__________________________________________________



11.
[Frozen]













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 013 secrets from Secret Submission Post #376.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Okay here are some sources

[(Anonymous)]

Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. And stop using stupid "analogies".

Re: Okay here are some sources

[(Anonymous)]

Dude, that's the first analogy I've even used.

But in all seriousness, I just do not get how everyone is like, "yeah it's super okay to choose which news site to pull from based on the quality of its layout rather than the quality of its content!"

Re: Okay here are some sources

[(Anonymous)]

This isn't a paper you're submitting in English class, anon; not all links have to be fact checked beforehand. As it is, a user linked to a website to supplement two other sources, after that website seemed to confirm the other information from other sources. You don't have to believe that particular source's information if you don't want to, but the other two more reputable sources say mostly the same thing.

Re: Okay here are some sources

[(Anonymous)]

Just because it's not a paper that's being submitted to English class does not mean that sources shouldn't be checked. There's so much misinformation out there, and people take it to heart, and, among other things, they vote based on it. Facts and evidence should underlie the positions that we take, whether we take them in a class or in real life.

I will grant you that the other sources give similar information (although I am also skeptical of HuffPost). But I don't think that negates the necessity of calling out a poor publication.

Re: Okay here are some sources

[(Anonymous)]

NA Omigosh you are a wanker. You are belabouring the point obstreperously. Fucking hush now.

Re: Okay here are some sources

[(Anonymous)]

My god that is such a good word. I'm probably not going to hush, but I'm so glad that you used "obstreperously" in a sentence. That is a feat that depressingly few manage to accomplish.