case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-03-20 06:51 pm

[ SECRET POST #2634 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2634 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Lady Gaga]


__________________________________________________



03.
[free!, attack on titan]


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.
(Panic! at the Disco)


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.
[Anarky]


__________________________________________________



10.
(Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.)


__________________________________________________



11.
[Frozen]













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 013 secrets from Secret Submission Post #376.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Okay here are some sources

(Anonymous) 2014-03-21 02:04 am (UTC)(link)
In any case, my point is that disreputable sites require a higher level of scrutiny then "this layout is nice, but this layout is ugly,"

But you know that's not where the scrutiny began and ended. It was more like:

1. Here is a story
2. I'd like more information about the story
3. Hey, these two sites have some additional information
4. They're not the best sites, but their additional information seems to jive with what everyone else is reporting
5. This information is not available elsewhere
6. So of these two sites, which is easier to browse?

It's intellectually dishonest for you to pretend otherwise. Your high horse is getting mighty tired.

Re: Okay here are some sources

(Anonymous) 2014-03-21 02:16 am (UTC)(link)
Is there some conspiracy among everyone to present exactly six points?

But in all seriousness, my high horse isn't really all that high. I'll readily admit that I'm not above anyone. There'll probably be a time when kaijin is on top of something and I'm not. I'd bet on it. But in this case, she isn't.

I'm not being intellectually dishonest at all. On the contrary, you're adding in a bunch of steps with no evidence to suggest that they happened or that they exist.

Re: Okay here are some sources

(Anonymous) 2014-03-21 07:57 am (UTC)(link)
NA No evidence maybe, but they are logical assumptions about logical steps. How the fuck does your brain work.