[ SECRET POST #2637 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2637 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 070 secrets from Secret Submission Post #377.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Except it is relevant to the discussion, the game would not be received as a South Park game just because it has the label "South Park" attached to it. Every franchise has with it certain expectations that come with that franchise and that effects how creators will develop a story.

I would not call it a special case, and yes, they could have made a different story, but I highly doubt it'd be easy to make a story with both a male playable and female playable character. That is the issue. Not even so much that there couldn't be a female protagonist, but because I don't know that there could be one at the same time as the male one. The dialogue, story, and character reactions would all be different if the protagonist was female. This is how South Park runs.

You were responding to a secret and a comment that very much was talking about the rules of the South Park world. If you want to talk about gender inequalities in the gaming industry, go right ahead. But don't challenge specific games unless you know a bit about them.

[world_eater]

Are you fucking kidding me right now.


Have you actually read my comments or are you arguing against some random strawman that you've thought yourself up?

[(Anonymous)]

I read what you said and I agreed with certain points, I said as such. But I think it's a simplistic approach to just say, "But they could have just made an entirely different game!" when we're trying to have a discussion about the game at hand.

I also don't think it's helpful to go into media discussions where you haven't consumed the media and talk about how it should be changed. Critique of media doesn't work that way, you critique it after you've viewed it, not before.

[(Anonymous)]

WTH is wrong with you? You're being a mega asshole.