Case (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
case) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
fandomsecrets2014-03-26 06:42 pm
case) wrote in fandomsecrets2014-03-26 06:42 pm
[ SECRET POST #2640 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2640 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.
__________________________________________________
02.
__________________________________________________
03.
__________________________________________________
04.
__________________________________________________
05.
__________________________________________________
06.
__________________________________________________
07.
__________________________________________________
08.
__________________________________________________
09.
__________________________________________________
10.
__________________________________________________
11.
__________________________________________________
12.
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 031 secrets from Secret Submission Post #377.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
Re: Horrifying things
(Anonymous) 2014-03-27 03:27 am (UTC)(link)I agree that a wild animal attacking a human that's invaded it's territory isn't reason to kill it and the baby was there against the rules - but in this case I think there might be cause for it.
The people were on a path so other humans in that area would be familiar to the chimp (I don't know much about them but I assume they're intelligent enough to deduce that) and the chimp ran up, alone, to a *group* of humans and snatched the baby out of a harness on one of their torsos. This wasn't a case of a toddler straggling behind or wandering a bit away, the articles said the baby was still held and bound to that girl when the chimp took her. In combination with it's previously known extreme aggression toward other animals I think at the very least they should have just let it die of the disease it got.
Re: Horrifying things
After some thought I'm in favor of doing that anyway, since it can't be proven that the disease he got was human-borne. That, combined with the danger he posed, probably would have made leaving him (or euthanizing him when it was clear he would die on his own) a better choice.
That's just from what I know, though - I'm not an expert or super well-informed.