[ SECRET POST #2641 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2641 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 018 secrets from Secret Submission Post #377.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: A hypothetical question

[(Anonymous)]

Wouldn't make a damn bit of difference what I did with it. Since the economy and the idea of money are based on assigning value to something that's basically just a place holder, anything I did to redistribute wealth would end with people in power finding a way to be "wealthy" again. Considering that, I would probably distribute it back almost exactly the way it was, but make those I know a little bit better off.

Now, if my time stop included the ability to continue distributing money after everything was in motion again (i.e., if I could make it so schools were better funded in general even without playing money god) that would be different.