[ SECRET POST #2643 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2643 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 075 secrets from Secret Submission Post #378.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Horror genre rant with major Hannibal spoilers

[(Anonymous)]

AYRT

The evidence she had found was the stitches hidden in the other stitches. Hiding the missing kidney. Meaning that there were layers upon layers in the evidence. Thus she should have (I think would have) looked again through everything, checking for hidden layers. And how do you think she would have gotten the evidence she found in Hannibal's house tested? I know that fictional crime labs don't have the backlog of real ones, but they still need at least some procedure to log in evidence.

It was incredibly stupid of her to go to Hannibal's. Even if she found nothing, that wouldn't prove he wasn't the killer. Just that he didn't have anything there. It would be incredibly easy for him to have another place to process things. And if she did find something, as it couldn't be used for evidence (even if she could find a way to process it on her own to prove it was evidence), all it would do would be to alert Hannibal that someone, likely her, was onto him. And he would adapt accordingly. And, basically, it would be her death sentence, even if she weren't caught there. (Which she had no real provisions for, which is also careless.)

2. All she had to do was shoot him center of mass. There were no real obstacles in the way that I could see, so she should have hit him. An untrained person, maybe not, but a trained one? From that distance? Unlikely. (Except when the writing needs it to work out in that manner. Which, again, I consider lazy writing.)

Re: Horror genre rant with major Hannibal spoilers

[(Anonymous)]

2. Except he specifically turned out the lights and ducked low to the ground. After that instant, she'd have no idea where he was.