[ SECRET POST #2644 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2644 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 062 secrets from Secret Submission Post #378.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I had never heard the term "weaponized femininity" until very recently (I assumed it wasn't actually new, but I can't say) but the idea I got of what it should be about if it's done effectively, is taking feminine qualities, which were originally imposed on woman as boundaries or ways to please men, and making them all about you and your strength.

What the feminists who criticize it have a problem with looks like one of two things: either it's not done effectively so the femininity ends up not actually being empowering (I agree with this), or it's not possible for femininity to be empowering at all (I disagree with this).