[ SECRET POST #2650 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2650 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 062 secrets from Secret Submission Post #379.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Questions there's never a good time to ask.

[feotakahari]

Wow. Forget religion--do you have ANYTHING that you value enough that you'd take it as an insult to yourself if someone degraded it? A nation? A hero? Your mother?

Re: Questions there's never a good time to ask.

[dreemyweird]

Oh, ok, maybe I was too hasty with "values". I rather thought you meant it in the context of the discussion, as in "religious values".

Certain people and/or traits, yes. If somebody insulted my best friend. If somebody insulted my nation(s), though, I'd just assume they're a violent idiot.

I was mostly talking ideologies and belief systems there. And I don't mind these getting insulted.

Re: Questions there's never a good time to ask.

[feotakahari]

"Oh, ok, maybe I was too hasty with "values". I rather thought you meant it in the context of the discussion, as in "religious values"."

I did, actually. That's what I was trying to get at--that religion can be that personal and that intimate. (There's a reason it's described as your relationship with God.)

Re: Questions there's never a good time to ask.

[dreemyweird]

Yes, I think I see it now. Tbf the point was to attack intellectual beliefs rather than the emotional ones (I am not against emotional religious beliefs at all), but it's true that the line is pretty flimsy.