[ SECRET POST #2650 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2650 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 062 secrets from Secret Submission Post #379.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Possible wank inducer? Still "interesting" though

[(Anonymous)]

That first part about Bundy seems so poorly written. Like something a high-schooler would write in an essay. I see what you're saying now, though, about the overall tone being a little off. It's like it has okay basic points but the way they try and get them across just seems...sensationalist? Immature? Not-quite-right? Idk.

If I were you I'd actually bring this up in class (if it's the type of class that likes these kinds of open discussion on readings). If you can articulate a little better what exactly you feel to be wrong about it, it could lead to a really good discussion.