[ SECRET POST #2650 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2650 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 062 secrets from Secret Submission Post #379.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Questions there's never a good time to ask.

[(Anonymous)]

Half of North America (everything west of the Rockies plus Texas, Oklahoma, and a large portion of Mexico) deals with regular brush or forest fires. That's just what happens in areas with little rainfall where summer temperatures regularly range around 35-45C. Everyone east of the Rockies deals with tornadoes and possibly flooding, and hurricanes on the coast. Should no one live in North America because there could be a natural disaster? Where in the world would they go where natural disasters DON'T happen?

Steps are taken to protect people. Buildings have to meet certain codes, in many states fireworks are banned, fire blocks are built, levees are built, hurricane evacuation routes and planned and marked along highways, people build storm shelters and make survival kits. But disasters happen fucking everywhere.

Re: Questions there's never a good time to ask.

[(Anonymous)]

NAYRT

All of this is true, yet in my home state, after the hugely destructive floods of 2008, you heard of people rebuilding their town on the exact spot where it was when it was destroyed in the flood of 1993, and in every major flood before that. And we're not talking about a place like Iowa City, where it would be prohibitively difficult to relocate the whole place--we're talking about towns of maybe 200 people. And what really grinds my gears is that this is typically presented like it's some heroic enterprise--like "We're not gonna let Mother Nature tell us where we can build our town!"--instead of extreme stupidity.