case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-04-06 04:02 pm

[ SECRET POST #2651 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2651 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 051 secrets from Secret Submission Post #379.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 2 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2014-04-07 10:52 am (UTC)(link)
Then you're kind of missing the point. I have no plans to sell fanfic. I could try it now... who'd stop me? Like fanart, it'd probably be under the radar enough that the copyright holder wouldn't even find out.

It's the irrational double standard that people apply and all the really weak arguments in the thread for why selling fanart is okay and different that bugs me, because it doesn't make sense. People get sidetracked by talk of quality, marketability, how expensive the tools are... That's all irrelevant. The point the OP is talking about is the legality of selling fanworks. The legality is the same for both art AND fic, which is to say, muddy at best and probably not kosher but feasible just the same because usually nobody will sue you.

It's the same. Yet many people who think one is okay considers the other off-limits for some nebulous reason.

(Anonymous) 2014-04-07 03:28 pm (UTC)(link)
The legality isn't a double-standard. It is more dangerous for companies to allow fic than to allow art to be sold without being licensed material. Shades of the whole Mercedes Lackey debacle. Both are iffy legally, or maybe downright illegal, but TPTB generally crack down on fic because there's more of a risk to them with a story than with a picture.

From a selling point, it's harder for people to know what they're getting. Clearly folks would, and do, buy fic. I've got no beef against that. But pretending it's so very UNFAIR is just looking at it from a fandom point of view, and it seems silly.

(Anonymous) 2014-04-08 04:51 pm (UTC)(link)
This is not true.

There is not risk to them at all, and it has been proven otherwise over and over again.

(Anonymous) 2014-04-09 07:26 am (UTC)(link)
How could fics for sale be any more dangerous than all the fics there are for free???

I mean... you only read fics after you've purchased and consumed the source material, generally...

(The Mercedes Lackey think is bunk.)