[ SECRET POST #2651 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2651 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 051 secrets from Secret Submission Post #379.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 2 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[pts]

I don't agree with the previous commenter, but I think they mean the experience of looking at a piece of fanart is immediate -- it is what it is, it looks like what it looks like, and whether or not it's technically well-executed is trivial to determine with some amount of objectivity.

Obviously there's latitude for personal taste, but broadly speaking, it's immediately obvious whether a fanartist is "good" or not.

You have to spend some time on a piece of fanfic to know whether the author's any good, and time as well to tell whether or not they're telling a story that you are going to find personally rewarding to read. It's a much greater time investment than looking at a piece of fanart.

[(Anonymous)]

You mean like buying a book?

This is so weird. Has anyone ever had a conversation like this about non fandom art and writing? Are books somehow not really worth the money everyone has been paying for them because art is faster to consume. The real world suggests otherwise.