[ SECRET POST #2654 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2654 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.
[Ioan Gruffudd/Fantastic Four 2005]


__________________________________________________



02.
[Laurell K. Hamilton]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Bates Motel]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Sherlock]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Korn; Breaking Benjamin]


__________________________________________________



06.
[American Horror Story]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Gwyneth Paltrow, Iron Man]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Kino's journey/Kino no tabi]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Roxy Music]












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 019 secrets from Secret Submission Post #379.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: .

[(Anonymous)]

Being proud of your body is enough reason for me. The fact it's not for you tells me you're not as sex positive as you think.

Re: .

[(Anonymous)]

If I think that people should not walk around in their underwear in the office, does that mean that I'm not sex positive?

Re: .

[(Anonymous)]

If your co-workers and boss give you the side eye just remember, they're body shaming you.

Re: .

[(Anonymous)]

That's a completely unequal comparison and you know it.

Re: .

[(Anonymous)]

No, it's really not.

You either believe that someone can dress explicitly without a purpose for it whenever they want, or you don't. And if you don't, then you must believe that there are rules/standards/what-have-you for dressing explicitly. And if you believe that there are rules/standards/what-have-you, then you can't really blame someone else for also having rules/standards/what-have-you. The content of those standards might be problematic, I'll grant, but simply having them doesn't mean that a person isn't or can't be sex positive.