case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-04-09 06:36 pm

[ SECRET POST #2654 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2654 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.
[Ioan Gruffudd/Fantastic Four 2005]


__________________________________________________



02.
[Laurell K. Hamilton]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Bates Motel]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Sherlock]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Korn; Breaking Benjamin]


__________________________________________________



06.
[American Horror Story]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Gwyneth Paltrow, Iron Man]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Kino's journey/Kino no tabi]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Roxy Music]












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 019 secrets from Secret Submission Post #379.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: OP

(Anonymous) 2014-04-10 03:18 pm (UTC)(link)
Labels are words...?

Also, music labels don't exist to be "edgy." They exist for clarification and classification. For people who like to talk about music in general rather than specific terms, it's far easier to reference a common lexicon than to have to describe or play individual songs/bands. This isn't exactly an unusual thing. Other types of media are similarly given labels and sub-labels.

For example, how do you feel about book genres? Do you think it's childish for someone to say, "I like military science fiction," "I like high fantasy," "I like Gothic horror," or "I like Victorian literature?"

Re: OP

(Anonymous) 2014-04-11 07:35 am (UTC)(link)
Except we're talking about new invented bullshit.