case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-04-10 07:16 pm

[ SECRET POST #2655 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2655 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Divergent]


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04. [WARNING for underage character+sex?]



__________________________________________________



05.
[Archer]


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.
[Hannibal]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Wolverine and the X-Men]










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 07 secrets from Secret Submission Post #379.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 2 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
diet_poison: (Default)

[personal profile] diet_poison 2014-04-11 12:10 am (UTC)(link)
I get really tired in general of people talking about objective quality. And it doesn't help that those people usually come off as snobs/elitists anyway. This is no exception.
dreemyweird: (murky)

[personal profile] dreemyweird 2014-04-11 08:24 am (UTC)(link)
I know what you are talking about, but at the same time I can say that I often find myself tired of people talking about how no objective quality exists. I just want to say, sorry, it's not true, go read some actual literary criticism research.