[ SECRET POST #2655 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2655 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Divergent]


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04. [WARNING for underage character+sex?]



__________________________________________________



05.
[Archer]


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.
[Hannibal]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Wolverine and the X-Men]










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 07 secrets from Secret Submission Post #379.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 2 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Is "objectively" the new "literally"?

[(Anonymous)]

How is it becoming meaningless? OP is using it as it's meant -- that the books, when viewed from an unbiased stance, are tripe -- and even if they're (objectively!) wrong, they're still using the word correctly.

Re: Is "objectively" the new "literally"?

[(Anonymous)]

OP is approaching them from a biased stance, however. Disliking something is a bias.

Re: Is "objectively" the new "literally"?

[diet_poison]

Thank you.