[ SECRET POST #2659 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2659 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 062 secrets from Secret Submission Post #380.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Sorry, but you are wrong.

[(Anonymous)]

If someone ties you up and whips you and you enjoy the experience and do it intentionally, whether or not your enjoyment is sexual, yes, it's kink. Plenty of people in the kink community experience kink that way. At most play parties I've ever been to, sure, people get aroused, but plenty of people don't, and sex is often not allowed.

Re: Sorry, but you are wrong.

[(Anonymous)]

Exactly. A lot of kinks don't even involve having sex. Doesn't make the kink suddenly non-sexual.

Re: Sorry, but you are wrong.

[(Anonymous)]

... but that's exactly what this sub-thread is about. Kinks are inherently sexual. They can't be "platonic".

Re: Sorry, but you are wrong.

[whositwhatsit]

But it's really not kink. Kink is inherently an expression of sexuality, full stop. An activity, even if it's one very commonly associated with sexual expression, is not a kink when done completely divorced from some component of that purpose.

And it sounds like you're saying that "having sex" is required for something to be sexual, when it's not. Those people getting aroused, even if not having sex, are expressing themselves sexually and experiencing some level of sexual gratification from the activities they are engaging in. THAT is what makes it kink. Without the arousal (or expectation of or hope for arousal) as the underlying purpose in doing it, it's just...an activity.

Re: Sorry, but you are wrong.

[darkmanifest]

I'm not really feeling the whole "lol getting whipped for fun is just roleplaying hdu" comments, but wouldn't non-sexual masochism fall more accurately under the general umbrella of "BDSM" or "D/s" instead of "kink"?