[ SECRET POST #2660 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2660 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 048 secrets from Secret Submission Post #380.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Not OP, but I think the main difference is that no one thinks Game of Thrones is actual-facts history (I hope. No one can actually be that stupid, right?), which isn't the case for Vikings - I've heard multiple people insist that since it's shown on the History channel, it must be historical fact. And even those who do know Vikings isn't based on factual historical accounts don't necessarily know it's from the sagas, whereas most casual GoT fans are at least aware that there are books.

Not all, though. Working in a bookstore has left me without hope that there will ever be a series for which someone, somewhere doesn't assume the books inspiring it are tie-ins.