Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-04-19 03:53 pm
[ SECRET POST #2664 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2664 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 075 secrets from Secret Submission Post #381.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-04-19 09:35 pm (UTC)(link)That is a terrible assumption to make. A lack of proof indicates an absence of sufficient evidence for a phenomenon, not that said phenomenon doesn't exist or isn't possible.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-04-19 09:45 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-04-19 10:07 pm (UTC)(link)There can be evidence against something, just as there can be evidence for something. When there's an absence of either, then we cannot say that the phenomenon does not exist; we can only say that we currently do not know whether it does.
no subject
You are not obligated to believe they exist, but you cannot conclusively disprove it.
(Well, you could make a case, for, say, wizards, but not really for ghosts. for example)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-04-20 08:03 am (UTC)(link)