[ SECRET POST #2664 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2664 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 075 secrets from Secret Submission Post #381.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

But saying that people are objectively wrong to believe in some of the accompanying trappings of religion is a different story. Usually people don't just claim God exists. They claim a whole store of concomitant beliefs, supposedly documented in a Book that has no provenance, containing a number of events which are very *easily* disproven by Science.

And when my freaking tenured biology professor tries to teach me the precepts of Creationism in a State University Biology 101 class? That's when I very forcefully say, "You're objectively wrong."

[diet_poison]

um, I know lots of religious people who say you cannot prove nor disprove the existence of God. In fact those are the kinds of religious people you are talking to on this thread. You seem to be addressing people who aren't here when you're referring to people trying to scientifically document God.

And I feel like this should be obvious, but believing in a literal Genesis =/= everyone who believes in God.