case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-04-21 07:02 pm
  • Add Memory
  • Share This Entry

[ SECRET POST #2666 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2666 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #381.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

(Anonymous) 2014-04-21 11:36 pm (UTC)(link)
what, you're disappointed because they didn't include the sleep-rape or the eyes getting scratched out by thornbushes?

(Anonymous) 2014-04-21 11:41 pm (UTC)(link)
No? Just saying that it's so far off the original that already that being all purist about the new adaption is silly.

(Anonymous) 2014-04-22 12:02 am (UTC)(link)
If even half the spoilers are true then there are going to be more differences between either Disney's Sleeping Beauty or the original tale and the Maleficent movie than there are between 1959's Sleeping Beauty and the original tale.
And these differences are not good or interesting, as it's mostly turning everyone's personality around.

(Anonymous) 2014-04-21 11:43 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, hi, Logical Fallacies Anon. Haven't seen you in a bit?

(Anonymous) 2014-04-22 12:53 am (UTC)(link)
...huh? I'm not any logical fallacies anon, I'm actually ibbity who didn't bother to sign in today. I just took the wrong meaning from the oc's comment and thought they were miffed specifically that the cartoon prettified the story (though what else one can expect from Disney, especially in the 50s, I really don't know.)
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only