case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-04-22 06:51 pm

[ SECRET POST #2667 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2667 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 041 secrets from Secret Submission Post #381.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
dreemyweird: (murky)

[personal profile] dreemyweird 2014-04-23 12:29 am (UTC)(link)
I have this weird thing where my attitude towards fictional 'verses functions exactly the same way my attitude towards the real world does. Not as in "I'm delusional and think that fiction is real", but as in "I understand it is not real, but if it were, my feelings, though stronger, would be essentially of the same nature".

And, like, the very idea of "disregarding" a piece of canon is so weird to me? Because it won't make it not exist? It will still be a part of the universe. It's like disregarding a real-life event because you don't like it.
rubbertea: fanart of lester nygaard from the fargo tv show (Default)

[personal profile] rubbertea 2014-04-23 12:43 am (UTC)(link)
i'm not gonna speak for a_potato, but personally, i know it won't make it not exist. that's not the point. the point is to focus on the good and not the bad in order to enjoy yourself, to not think about sucky things for a while.
it's not like disregarding a real life event because you don't like it, it's more like, idk, focusing on the good times you had with someone instead of the times you fought.
dreemyweird: (murky)

[personal profile] dreemyweird 2014-04-23 12:51 am (UTC)(link)
I... dunno, I suppose I can see that. It depends on how bad the fights were, really. There's a point where you can't focus on the good times anymore, no matter how good they were. Because the person does something really awful and they cease to be good in your eyes. Same with fiction.
rubbertea: fanart of lester nygaard from the fargo tv show (Default)

[personal profile] rubbertea 2014-04-23 01:10 am (UTC)(link)
i agree that sometimes a person can become irredeemable in your eyes, but for me that's never happened with fiction.
gondremark: (Default)

[personal profile] gondremark 2014-04-23 01:49 am (UTC)(link)
It's like if you have a seven course dinner, and all the courses are great except the dessert is burnt, you can go away disgruntled that what should have been a delicious chocolate cake was instead a block of cinders, or you could go away thinking about how great the rest of the meal was.

(Anonymous) 2014-04-24 11:38 am (UTC)(link)
I couldn't agree more. For example, I was very much into the HP books and pretty involved in the fandom. I read HP7 in less than 8 hours. Period. I just stopped. Like some people quit smoking. Literally like flicking the off switch. I look back at those times of enjoying HP very fondly, but for me the fascination is just over.

(Anonymous) 2014-04-24 11:47 am (UTC)(link)
But that's not really a good comparison, because the dessert wasn't dependent on the rest of the meal. A bad dessert doesn't change the taste or content of earlier courses.

To pull a comic booky example, if they suddenly reveal that a character's friendship was so he could get close to another character in order to kill him, it's not "five issues of two characters being really good friends and then one where he suddenly wants the other guy dead." That guy always wanted his "friend" dead. It changes the story that came before. And if you found that reveal to be bad enough, then it's going to retroactively make the rest of it bad too.

Or that bane of literary storytelling, "it was all a dream." If you get someone really invested in your world and characters and then reveal that even within their fictional world nothing that happened had any weight, impact or meaning, it feels like you were lied to, and it can totally ruin things retroactively.

Not saying it has to ruin things for everyone. But it's certainly undestandable how it will for some people in serial media.
a_potato: (Default)

[personal profile] a_potato 2014-04-23 12:54 am (UTC)(link)
Oh, I definitely accept that the actual canon still exists. I just make believe that it doesn't, ha!

But rubbertea made a good point in their reply, too: there's something in this approach of choosing to focus on the good in defiance of the bad. Like, my break-up with my first serious boyfriend was awful, but I fondly cherish the good memories I made with him prior to that.
dreemyweird: (murky)

[personal profile] dreemyweird 2014-04-23 01:02 am (UTC)(link)
Never happens to me. An awful quarrell=all good memories spoiled.

I guess my way of thinking is kind of... um...

a_potato: (Default)

[personal profile] a_potato 2014-04-23 01:10 am (UTC)(link)
Hahaha oh I love that image, so very much.

That kinda sucks, however, about one thing being able to wipe out all of the good memories. :-/