[ SECRET POST #2669 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2669 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 017 secrets from Secret Submission Post #381.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Non-Fandom rants

[ill_omened]

Right, but it's used outside that context to shut down any discussion, and demonstrating such a limiting approach. Because something isn't protected by the bill of rights doesn't mean it's acceptable or free from criticism.

If someone is saying the first amendment means you can't pull their article or offer them a platform, they are being pretty silly, but if they're arguing that the control of a media conglomerate is suppressing certain views the response shouldn't be "but the first amendment doesn't say it's wrong".