case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-04-28 07:59 pm

[ SECRET POST #2673 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2673 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 055 secrets from Secret Submission Post #382.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
diet_poison: (Default)

[personal profile] diet_poison 2014-04-29 12:40 am (UTC)(link)
In principle I agree, but I also understand where OP is coming from with the track record DW has with ladies and the prominent male writers having some trouble writing them well (because of their sexist worldviews). Yes, talent is important, but talent can be badly tainted by a worldview that limits you from writing women as complex individuals with agency rather than props or one-dimensional plot devices.

I'm not saying every woman on DW is like this, not by a long shot, but it seems to be a general trend, based on a good deal of commentary, observation, and some of the comments the writers have made about women and writing them.