case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-05-01 07:12 pm

[ SECRET POST #2676 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2676 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 019 secrets from Secret Submission Post #382.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2014-05-02 03:51 pm (UTC)(link)
I disagree, sort of - to some extent, quality is objective. I mean, I could make a fantasy series in my back yard, complete with boobs and red paint blood splatters, and you might like it better than GoT but it is probably not better in quality.

That being said, I think GoT is objectively crap. It's not half as clever as it thinks it is, and relies on gratuity and shock value to make it interesting. Yes, the books did, too. Was a lot of work put into it? Sure, and that is fair. But that doesn't make the writing, plot or characters good.