[ SECRET POST #2676 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2676 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 019 secrets from Secret Submission Post #382.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Taste is subjective and your idea of quality is based on your tastes, therefore quality is subjective, as well. Personally, I think it's well put together in terms of setting and production, but I think that much of the plot and characterization is so bad, I would call it crappy. That's my opinion and it's not better than yours, and your opinion is no better than mine.

[diet_poison]

therefore quality is subjective, as well.

Yes. This.

[(Anonymous)]

Taste is subjective and your idea of quality is based on your tastes, therefore quality is subjective, as well.

This so much.

[(Anonymous)]

"Taste is subjective and your idea of quality is based on your tastes"

If you can't distinguish between good and bad and can judge things from an objective point of view, that's your problem. But anyone who isn't a self-centered kid can distinguish between good and bad and acknowledge that something you like might be bad, and that things that you dislike can be good. So no, quality isn't subjective.

[(Anonymous)]

I disagree, sort of - to some extent, quality is objective. I mean, I could make a fantasy series in my back yard, complete with boobs and red paint blood splatters, and you might like it better than GoT but it is probably not better in quality.

That being said, I think GoT is objectively crap. It's not half as clever as it thinks it is, and relies on gratuity and shock value to make it interesting. Yes, the books did, too. Was a lot of work put into it? Sure, and that is fair. But that doesn't make the writing, plot or characters good.