[ SECRET POST #2682 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2682 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 024 secrets from Secret Submission Post #383.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

op

[(Anonymous)]

I'm well aware of his appearance in Battle Scars, and I thought the ending where Marcus Johnson turns into a movie Nick Fury clone, including making his best friend turn out to be Coulson, was very stupid.

I also think it's stupid you'd jump to conclusions like I didn't know what I was talking about.

op again

[(Anonymous)]

you're also incorrect in why he's named nick fury. it turned out to be his legal birth name, so he took it even though he knew himself as marcus johnson his whole life. it wasn't him taking his father's name as a legacy ala james bond or whatever.

Re: op

[(Anonymous)]

Well, if you write something that indicates you don't know what you're talking about, then it's a reasonable assumption.

I'm confused by your mindset. They made Marcus a "Nick Fury" clone? But...he was always supposed to be Nick Fury. That was his origin story. Fury is a big part of the movies, so naturally they'd want to pull that into the main 'verse. He's not a clone of the white Nick Fury. But he's not a "clone" of movie!Fury either. He's just...movie!Fury in the comics.

I dunno, it seems as weird to me as saying that the Harley Quinn in the comics is just a clone of the DCAU Harley Quinn. They made a media jump, is all.

Re: op

[(Anonymous)]

except it's not just a media jump, and your comparison makes no sense.

when they introduced harley quinn in the comics, she was the same character from the show, albeit maybe a little darker. she wasn't replacing anyone.

the nick fury in the movies is nick fury. he's not the son of the real nick fury, ala nick fury jr.

here they're creating a new character who looks like the movie version to replace the original pre-existing character the movie version was based on.

Re: op

[(Anonymous)]

"The nick fury in the movies is nick fury. he's not the son of the real nick fury, ala nick fury jr."

He could be. We don't really know anyone at SHIELD's backstory. But it's been there for awhile.

But still...why does it matter?

Re: op

[(Anonymous)]

he could also be a secret unicorn, but chances are he isn't.

why does what matter? that they're replacing a classic character with some bland new one to tie in with the movies?