[ SECRET POST #2686 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2686 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 059 secrets from Secret Submission Post #384.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Controversial opinions

[diet_poison]

Yeah, was going to say this. I can see "pansexual" which 99% of the time will be functionally the same as "bisexual". I also agree with ayrt that sometimes they blur together.

Re: Controversial opinions

[(Anonymous)]

There was this great definition of pansexual I read somewhere, which defined it as attraction to all genders, whereas bisexual was defined as attraction to some genders.

Which I thought removed some of the tendency for people to view bisexuality as transphobic, and pansexuality as 100% accepting.

Re: Controversial opinions

[(Anonymous)]

What are the genders to that pan is attracted to and bi is not?

Because I've only seen pan as treating trans as a third gender, which is pretty damn transphobic.

Re: Controversial opinions

[(Anonymous)]

I agree with your comment RE: pansexual actually being transphobic in many cases. Pretty ironic considering the amount of shit bisexuals get for even identifying as bi! :/

I think the best way to illustrate it is being attracted to people who identify neutral/other/third/no gender, in addition to people identifying as male and female.

Whereas someone identifying as bi may be attracted to people who identify as male & female, for example, or people who identify as neutrois & female, but not ALL expressions of gender.

How people USUALLY define bisexual & pansexual are: "attracted to men & women" and "attracted to ALL genders including trans!", both of which end up causing wank all over tumblr.

That made a lot more sense to me when someone explained it, anyway. And it seems to eliminate a lot of the debate about transphobia. (Obviously there's still problems with it, but these are the definitions I feel are least shitty to everyone involved.)

Re: Controversial opinions

[diet_poison]

I thought bi was defined as being attracted to men and women, not men + some other gender or women + some other gender. o.O

(I spend very little time on tumblr)