case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-05-11 03:46 pm

[ SECRET POST #2686 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2686 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 059 secrets from Secret Submission Post #384.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
diet_poison: (Default)

Re: Controversial opinions

[personal profile] diet_poison 2014-05-13 01:16 am (UTC)(link)
No, it didn't, because the "freedom to have a kid" thing came up after the ethnicity/eugenics thing was shoved into the conversation.

And yes, from a completely literal standpoint, you have the freedom to have a kid. I retract my previous statement about that because I see now how creepy that was.

I do think that the way you put it made it sound like nobody cared about the consequences involved for the kid itself. Which is what worries me and scares me a bit about this conversation.
(reply from suspended user)
diet_poison: (Default)

Re: Controversial opinions

[personal profile] diet_poison 2014-05-13 03:11 pm (UTC)(link)
I didn't say I didn't care about your links, I said I agreed with the point you were trying to make with them, which I have iterated at least a dozen times on this thread, so I'm not sure why you keep throwing them at me.

Your entire last paragraph doesn't really apply to anything I said. Actually, nobody said "poor people shouldn't have kids" and nobody agreeing with OP ever brought up "crazy welfare moms". There's a difference between being poor, and if you are in a position where you can barely feed yourself, how are you going to feed a kid? I actually think social programs like welfare *help* with this and make it more possible to raise a kid and therefore less dire to have one when you're struggling financially. Individual situations vary.

I don't really know what else to say here...I guess there's just a big disconnect here in that we're kinda talking about related by slightly different things.