case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-05-16 06:56 pm

[ SECRET POST #2691 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2691 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________
















11. [WARNING for sexual assault, rape, bullying]

[Akuma Kyoushi]


__________________________________________________



12. [WARNING for rape]



__________________________________________________



13. [WARNING for rape]



__________________________________________________



14. [WARNING for dub-con?]



__________________________________________________



15. [WARNING for rape, pedophilia, etc?]

[X-Men: Days of Future Past]















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #384.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2014-05-17 12:27 am (UTC)(link)
Yes they are. Rowling pretty much made it plain as day in the books/movies.
greenvelvetcake: (Default)

[personal profile] greenvelvetcake 2014-05-17 01:21 am (UTC)(link)
She made it plain the kids who wound up in Slytherin were, more often than not, raised by parents with toxic mindsets and then plunked into a school environment that encouraged competition to an unhealthy degree. Shit, their head of house was a man who actively bullied young kids and showed unfair favoritism at every turn.

Or you know, they could all just be evil. That's easier.
Edited 2014-05-17 01:22 (UTC)

(Anonymous) 2014-05-17 01:39 am (UTC)(link)
Their head of house was also a man who gave up his life and so much more to atone for his past actions. But let's forget that pesky detail, shall we?
greenvelvetcake: (Default)

[personal profile] greenvelvetcake 2014-05-17 01:47 am (UTC)(link)
Gave up his life how? If he hadn't gone to Dumbledore, he would have been locked away in Azkaban for being a Death Eater after Voldemort fell. Instead, he got to live in a castle, using his power to make kids miserable. All because he was obsessed with a woman who wanted nothing to do with him.

The only past action he wanted to atone for was the fact that he wasn't able to save Lily. We never see remorse for anything he'd done as a Death Eater. He didn't atone, he just picked the winning side.

(Anonymous) 2014-05-17 02:04 am (UTC)(link)
It's exactly that kind of cutthroat maneuvering that has a certain appeal in some circles.
ceebeegee: (Default)

[personal profile] ceebeegee 2014-05-17 04:34 am (UTC)(link)
No! I love my Slugsy. Slugsy was NOT evil. Nor was Snape.

(Anonymous) 2014-05-17 05:27 am (UTC)(link)
Snape wasn't really good, either, though.

Slughorn was, though. The One Good Slytherin*

*that JKR remembered to write about, not that ever lived

(Anonymous) 2014-05-17 09:01 am (UTC)(link)
Slughorn was a good guy all right--and a born politician. I figure *evil* isn't a Slytherin speciality (since you can be brave and bad or smart and bad) but political cunning (which could be used for good, after all) is.

(Anonymous) 2014-05-17 05:51 pm (UTC)(link)
It was then expanded upon in Pottermore, which, given that it's by the author, should be considered canon, and includes a lot of details on the House and it's members not seen through the eyes of a biased teenage boy during one of the biggest class-based wars facing wizardkind.