case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-05-17 04:05 pm

[ SECRET POST #2692 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2692 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 070 secrets from Secret Submission Post #385.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

[personal profile] cbrachyrhynchos 2014-05-18 03:10 am (UTC)(link)
GUYS, IT'S FANDOM.

Which answers your question. It's FANDOM, whose approach to interpreting art in terms of "canon" is roughly equivalent to Biblical-innerancy fundamentalism.