Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-05-17 04:05 pm
[ SECRET POST #2692 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2692 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 070 secrets from Secret Submission Post #385.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
I mean there are so many reasons I'm dubious about the new films I can't count them, but this massive flail about "de-canonizing" stuff is just so very strange to me.
+1
no subject
Which answers your question. It's FANDOM, whose approach to interpreting art in terms of "canon" is roughly equivalent to Biblical-innerancy fundamentalism.
Seconding
Re: Seconding
(Anonymous) 2014-05-18 04:14 am (UTC)(link)