[ SECRET POST #2693 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2693 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 058 secrets from Secret Submission Post #385.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ], [ 1 - blank image ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: So trigger warnings finally made the New York Times

[(Anonymous)]

All I see is this is a slippery slope to censorship. It will go from trigger warnings to out and out eliminating anything that is triggery. Unfortunately, there seems to be a rule these days that if it exists, someone will be offended/triggered by it.

Re: So trigger warnings finally made the New York Times

[diet_poison]

offended and triggered are very different things...

Re: So trigger warnings finally made the New York Times

[(Anonymous)]

(da)
tumblr loves to use "triggered" when they actualy mean "offended" tho

Re: So trigger warnings finally made the New York Times

[littlestbirds]

but anyone putting TW into effect in an institutional setting isn't going to refer to teens on tumblr for pointers. You either think triggers are an obstacle to people's desire to learn or you don't. "tumblr uses it wrong!" is a straw man.