case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-05-29 07:09 pm

[ SECRET POST #2704 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2704 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________



19.


__________________________________________________



20.


__________________________________________________



21.


__________________________________________________



22.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 022 secrets from Secret Submission Post #386.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2014-05-30 12:24 am (UTC)(link)
As I've actually run across this in published works, meaning someone got paid and still put that in, I feel your pain. (IE. K. Armstrong's Bitten, it was all right until for some odd reason it had to be pointed out that the main female character was a liberal journalist from Canada but then commented on a completely US issue, the Bush election with the Florida flap and it pulled me so OUT of the story I was all, let's get back to werewolves PLEASE!)
philstar22: (Default)

[personal profile] philstar22 2014-05-30 12:28 am (UTC)(link)
Oh, it is absolutely a published book issue. I read an essay by Sherilon Kenyon once where she complained that Buffy was too emasculating and that the seasons where Buffy was more feminine were better because they allowed Spike and Angel to be real men. I knew in that moment I was never going to read any of her books.

Then there are people like Terry Goodkind or Philip Pullman whose works are so completely about their philosophical view that they lose the story altogether and the books become preachy messes.

(Anonymous) 2014-05-30 01:11 am (UTC)(link)
I despise that thought process (Buffy emasculating S&A).
philstar22: (Spike/Dru)

[personal profile] philstar22 2014-05-30 01:13 am (UTC)(link)
Me too. She pretty much missed the whole point of Buffy and is clearly one of those authors who forced their worldview into even places where it doesn't fit.

(Anonymous) 2014-05-30 01:15 am (UTC)(link)
aarghhh Phillip Pullman makes me so mad

because i loved the Golden Compass and the worldbuilding and it was SO INTERESTING and it could have been so awesome!

and then the soapboxing started

what an awesome world & story, wasted.
philstar22: (Default)

[personal profile] philstar22 2014-05-30 01:16 am (UTC)(link)
Exactly. I hate when authors do that even when I agree with their perspective. Politics shouldn't get in the way of the story when you are writing fiction. If it works with the story, great (hey, Lord of the Rings is made of conservative, which is not in any way me, but the story works and that makes me love it in spite of the politics).
ext_18500: My non-fandom OC Oraania. She's crazy. (Default)

[identity profile] mimi-sardinia.livejournal.com 2014-05-30 10:05 am (UTC)(link)
In some ways I think the conservative Christian mindset that seeps through in LotR fits the pseudo-medieval setting. There are a lot of older moral standards that are implied in it, or fit into it naturally.
diet_poison: (Default)

[personal profile] diet_poison 2014-05-30 01:21 am (UTC)(link)
I read an essay by Sherilon Kenyon once where she complained that Buffy was too emasculating and that the seasons where Buffy was more feminine were better because they allowed Spike and Angel to be real men. I knew in that moment I was never going to read any of her books.

Man, I've never seen a single episode of Buffy but that mindset is making me DNW so hard

I mean, yuck
philstar22: (Spike/Dru)

[personal profile] philstar22 2014-05-30 01:26 am (UTC)(link)
Yuck is right. And also completely missing the point of Buffy. Buffy is all about empowerment (it has its problems, and I wouldn't say it is perfectly feminist, but female power is the point of the show).

(Anonymous) 2014-05-30 03:44 am (UTC)(link)
If you mean Sherrilyn Kenyon, some of her books are very good, and some of them are very bad. They're all pretty heteronormative for the most part, but some of them were very original in plot and scope. I can't emphasize "some" enough, though.
philstar22: (Spike/Dru)

[personal profile] philstar22 2014-05-30 03:46 am (UTC)(link)
Anyone with the perspective that a character like Buffy is emasculating (and that there is such a thing as emasculating at all) is not someone whose books I want to waste time reading even if they are good.