[ SECRET POST #2705 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2705 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Nostalgia Critic, Sailor Moon]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Sailor Moon]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Jessica Chastain]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Homestuck]


__________________________________________________



06.
[The Musketeers]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Absolutely Fabulous]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Disney's Big Hero 6]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Neil Gaiman and Amanda Palmer]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Revolution]


__________________________________________________



11.
[Disney Fairies; character is Vidia]


__________________________________________________



12. http://oi57.tinypic.com/28jg5l.jpg
[kind of pornish, illustrated]


__________________________________________________


13.


















14. [SPOILERS for Game of Thrones]



__________________________________________________



15. [SPOILERS for Transistor]



__________________________________________________



16. [SPOILERS for Hannibal]



__________________________________________________



17. [SPOILERS for Star-Crossed]



__________________________________________________



18. [SPOILERS for Captain America: The Winter Soldier]



__________________________________________________



19. [SPOILERS for Hannibal]
[WARNING for rape]



__________________________________________________


20. [WARNING for rape]



__________________________________________________



21. [WARNING for abuse]



__________________________________________________



22. [WARNING for rape/non-con]






















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #386.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[case]

Name the fandom. And repeats, etc.

[(Anonymous)]

Is a thread about how men getting raped is better than women getting raped really necessary?-> http://fandomsecrets.dreamwidth.org/1019916.html?thread=752806668#cmt752806668

[(Anonymous)]

I want to answer these last few points

1. I implied nothing like "Women can't sodomise men". See the part where I said "More likely to cause harm"?
2. However emotionally damaging a rape may be, a rape that emotionally damages AND physically damages is worse than a rape that only emotionally damages. Why are you people so keen to make a villain out of me.
3. Why did MY thread get frozen, but the FUCKER WHO WAS ACTUALLY TROLLING get's a pass?

[(Anonymous)]

you don't know when to quit, do you?

[comradesmiler]

People saw the part where you said "More likely to cause harm" and saw it as trivialising and generalising personal trauma.

[(Anonymous)]

It's impossible to discuss anything related to rape on this forum. Someone will always try to read between the lines and whip themselves into a righteous fury. Best to give up.

[riddian]

Why do you feel such a need to rate one kind as worse than another?

[(Anonymous)]

I'm not the OP of that thread but I doubt you all will believe me because I'm agreeing with them. All they're saying is that two wrongs are worse than one. Someone who rapes and murders gets a heavier sentence than someone who rapes without murdering. Not because the second person isn't still a horrible person, but because they did less than the first person. It's like the difference between killing one person and killing twenty. One is unforgivable, twenty is still worse.

Non-explicit incest: requires warning, y/n?

[(Anonymous)]

I have a secret involving an incestuous pairing ready to be submitted. The secret has nothing to do with their being related, and they weren't raised together, but they are in fact canonically genetic siblings. Does this need an incest warning?

Thank you to anyone who answers!

Re: Non-explicit incest: requires warning, y/n?

[(Anonymous)]

When in doubt, slap the warning on. Better to be safe than sorry and have a whole bunch of SJWs jumping on your ass.

But truth be told, if the secret involves a pairing that is biologically related... yeah, probably needs the incest warning.

Re: Non-explicit incest: requires warning, y/n?

[(Anonymous)]

It's been submitted with a "non-explicit incest" warning on it and a fandom/pairing label. This will probably make it very easy to figure out who I was come next Friday.