[ SECRET POST #2706 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2706 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 079 secrets from Secret Submission Post #387.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[brandiweed.livejournal.com]

Amusingly, Gary Gygax made the same error way back in the original AD&D Player's Handbook (describing monks as "monastic aesthetics").

To me, more than using the wrong word, I'm wondering *why* the author would describe the man as "ascetic" at that moment. Just mentioning the paleness is sufficient to point up his new pallor as unusual. And if the author was trying to use "ascetic" as a synonym for "thin and drawn" (which it isn't), it's still redundant unless mentioning that the man was looking thin even for him.

[(Anonymous)]

She might have been trying to say "handsome" but that makes no sense in the context of that sentence.