case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-06-08 03:48 pm

[ SECRET POST #2714 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2714 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13. [repeat]












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 071 secrets from Secret Submission Post #388.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
intrigueing: (Default)

Re: Fandom pet peeves

[personal profile] intrigueing 2014-06-08 11:29 pm (UTC)(link)
I generally really like slash fics but hate "slash interpretations" of canon, if that makes any sense. For me, the two are very different, somehow. There are a few specific non-canon ships (both slash and het) that I both see and like better than platonic friendship, but not too many.
dreemyweird: (Default)

Re: Fandom pet peeves

[personal profile] dreemyweird 2014-06-08 11:48 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm guessing you're talking taking canon events and inserting random slash or explaining said events with the help of non-canonical romance? I dislike this stuff, too, mostly because it sounds like the writer thought that the canon would have been better if it had their ship in it.
intrigueing: (Default)

Re: Fandom pet peeves

[personal profile] intrigueing 2014-06-09 02:00 am (UTC)(link)
Pretty much. Now, there are some canons where there's plot holes and ambiguous bits of unsatisfactory writing that *needs* explaining, but explaining it with romance (in cases where romance just is just so *not* the point of the show/book/whatever) rather than an explanation more thematically appropriate or that reinforces canonical material, and instead just replacing everything with "they're actually in love!" is so...insipid. It feels off-topic.