Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-06-20 07:59 pm
[ SECRET POST #2726 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2726 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[Naruto]
__________________________________________________
03.

[Transformers: Prime]
__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05. http://i.imgur.com/dkPX9Ym.gif
[moving .gif, Steven Ogg, Grand Theft Auto V]
__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07. [SPOILERS for Murder in the First]

__________________________________________________
08. [SPOILERS for Game of Thrones]

__________________________________________________
09. [WARNING for rape]

__________________________________________________
10. [WARNING for rape]

__________________________________________________
11. [WARNING for rape, abuse, etc]

__________________________________________________
12. [WARNING for rape, abuse, pedophilia, incest, ironically enough none of which OP warned for]

__________________________________________________
13. [WARNING for eating disorders]

__________________________________________________
14. [WARNING for suicide]

__________________________________________________
15. [WARNING for sexual abuse]

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #389.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - ships it ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Sexuality v. Sexual Orientation
Now, I like words just fine. I like new words that describe things that we didn't previously have words for. I think the problem comes when we start talking about labels and identities. Not only is demisexual silly because, imo, the definition is a bit too vague to even be useful in the first place (though I don't begrudge anyone's willingness to use it), it seems to deliberately fashion itself to sound like homosexual or bisexual. Which linguistically might not be a problem, but when it becomes a ~label~ and is asserted on a level equal to LGB people's orientation, that's annoying.
I guess I don't see the point in "identifying" as demisexual when it's easy enough to say that you are only sexually attracted to people you have close relationships with. Maybe I'm just turned off of the phrase since I'm gay myself, but yeah. Labels are a tricky thing. I see them as useful for understanding yourself, and asserting yourself (especially in the face of discrimination) but I don't think they're helpful when they start to define you. Especially when that label isn't an experience that's going to particularly shape your life and how the world treats you.