case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-06-21 04:20 pm

[ SECRET POST #2727 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2727 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 082 secrets from Secret Submission Post #390.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2014-06-22 03:34 am (UTC)(link)
When a word is taken into a language because that language has no term for what it's describing, that's valuable dissemination of language, ie not appropriation.

When a word that already has a perfectly functional equivalent in the recipient language is taken, that's a pointless and senseless use of the language, ie appropriation.

(Anonymous) 2014-06-22 03:38 am (UTC)(link)
Are you for real?

Do you honestly think something like kaput is appropriation because we already have broken?

(Anonymous) 2014-06-22 03:42 am (UTC)(link)
Do you honestly see "kawaii" becoming popularly disseminated as a synonym for cute? No, people only use it because it's Japanese and it makes them feel cool to use it.

(Anonymous) 2014-06-22 03:45 am (UTC)(link)
You're not addressing my question: is kaput cultural appropriation by your definition?

(Anonymous) 2014-06-22 04:00 am (UTC)(link)
I would personally not use the word. I don't come from a background where are a lot of Ashkenazi Jewish people. (I grew up in a suburb in the Midwest where the largest minorities were Latino and Hmong people.) It would be unnatural and, yes, appropriative for it to be a part of my lexicon. When it enters into a regional vocabulary by way of immigrants who disseminate parts of their ethnic background into the culture they immigrate to, which is how most Yiddish vocabulary entered the American English lexicon (very different from middle-class white kids deciding to use the words because they have a hard-on for a culture they have no stake in), that's more acceptable.

(Anonymous) 2014-06-22 04:05 am (UTC)(link)
Welp, better stop speaking then because you seem to have no fucking idea on how many English words come from other cultures.

(Anonymous) 2014-06-22 06:58 am (UTC)(link)
Oh my god you're a fucking idiot and have no idea about how language works.

(Anonymous) 2014-06-22 08:24 am (UTC)(link)
...The Linguist in me weeps.

(Anonymous) 2014-06-22 02:37 pm (UTC)(link)
Do you honestly see "kawaii" becoming popularly disseminated as a synonym for cute?

This is actually happening already. I have no opinion of it, just stating that yeah, it is becoming an actual thing. There've been articles about how it's becoming a thing.

(Anonymous) 2014-06-22 06:08 pm (UTC)(link)
Kawaii used as a synonym for cute is kind of widespread on the internet, and it mostly refers to a certain type of cute aesthetic (heavily inspired by the Japanese aesthetic) that's loaded with soft colors, cutesy emojis and childish things marketed at young adults. You don't call a puppy kawaii (unless you're 12 and very into anime, I guess), but you'd call something like Lolita fashion kawaii (albeit a bit ironically) because that's the aesthetic the word applies to in the west.

Language, it turns out, is very versatile.

(Anonymous) 2014-06-22 03:48 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah seriously, why do languages have synonyms at all! There should only be one word for any given thing! Any more is just appropriation!

Because the English language had no word for shmuck, glitch, heimish, or klutz.
Korean couldn't find a different word for "news" than "nyusu" despite the fact that the Chinese managed quite well with xinwen. And of course undong could never possibly be used to mean seupocheu (sports).

You're right, every single word ever loaned is because the other language had no word for it. Nobody but English speakers have sex or shit, that's why "shit" and "fuck" have been borrowed across borders.

(Anonymous) 2014-06-22 04:03 am (UTC)(link)
You do realize that English language vocabulary entering into other languages' lexicons usually happens because Americans and other Anglophone nations have forced their cultures on other countries, right?

(Anonymous) 2014-06-22 04:12 am (UTC)(link)
You do realize that blaming every single loan word from English on colonialism is idiotic? Especially with modern words like wifi?
Tell me more about how the Pilgrims brought wifi over on the Mayflower.

Also you conveniently ignored ALL THE MANY WORDS loaned from MANY LANGUAGES in favor of talking about English. I gave English as an example because I hoped it would be easier for you to comprehend.

Okay, so how about French loanwords in Korean? That is because the French occupied Korea during the late Koryo Dynasty, isn't it? ISN'T IT?

Please stop using English. Many of the words are from Greek/Latin; you are appropriating Roman and Greek culture.

(Anonymous) 2014-06-22 01:02 pm (UTC)(link)
lmao that's totally what happens in Japan. oh wait. no.

Japan uses English words (badly, and incorrectly) all over the damn place because it's cool. Not because it's "forced" on them, but because interjecting a couple random English words into a pop song, or on a T-shirt, etc, is so cool.

Any thoughts on appropriation in that case? lol