Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-06-26 06:47 pm
[ SECRET POST #2732 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2732 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
02.

__________________________________________________
03. [repeat]
__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 020 secrets from Secret Submission Post #390.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - spam ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-06-26 11:17 pm (UTC)(link)Seriously, if Genghis Khan is not working at a coffee shop purely as a cover for his take over of the local underworld, I shall be very disappointed.
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-06-27 12:31 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-06-26 11:10 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
no subject
Personally, I'm not someone who usually cares a lot about historical exactitude, as long as you have the basic chronology right. So I'd rather see something that's historical even if it's not entirely accurate. But that's just me I guess.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-06-27 12:45 am (UTC)(link)Do you think that's why they do it? It baffles me, because it seems to strip the fandom of its most important feature. But maybe they just find two of the actors hot.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-27 00:48 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-27 02:02 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-27 01:12 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-27 02:04 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-27 03:37 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-27 06:31 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-06-26 11:21 pm (UTC)(link)I sometimes get the impression that popular pairings get more absurd AU fics than unpopular ships, percentage-wise.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-06-26 11:34 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-06-26 11:47 pm (UTC)(link)That would be horrible. I'm usually into unpopular pairings with 10 fics total out of which 80% were written by me. ;)
Still, it's so frustrating when you finally ship something popular and still barely find any fic you'd want to read.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-06-27 04:28 pm (UTC)(link)Which fandom?
(Anonymous) 2014-06-26 11:56 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-06-27 12:07 am (UTC)(link)Depressing canons have more AUs
(Anonymous) 2014-06-27 01:22 am (UTC)(link)Re: Depressing canons have more AUs
(Anonymous) 2014-06-27 01:36 am (UTC)(link)Re: Depressing canons have more AUs
(Anonymous) 2014-06-27 01:41 am (UTC)(link)Re: Depressing canons have more AUs
(Anonymous) 2014-06-27 04:42 am (UTC)(link)Re: Depressing canons have more AUs
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-27 06:30 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Depressing canons have more AUs
(Anonymous) 2014-06-27 06:42 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-06-27 01:26 am (UTC)(link)